Queer, why that?

I want queer to remain a disorganizing intensity in proximity to a scene of desire; not just any elasticity that tweaks a norm. I just heard another queer temporality talk: and all forms of temporalstretching were called queer. Why that? Is “why not” a good enough response?

Extract from comments, Supervalent Thought blog, February 10, 2008, 5:32am